Anthropologie Structurale [C Levi-Strauss] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This reissue of a classic will reintroduce readers to Lévi-Strauss’s understanding of man and society in terms of individuals—kinship, social organization, religion. Get this from a library! Anthropologie structurale.. [Claude Lévi-Strauss].

Author: Kagahn Mazulkis
Country: Indonesia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 6 August 2005
Pages: 464
PDF File Size: 8.49 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.29 Mb
ISBN: 478-9-56208-111-1
Downloads: 29225
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fenrikus

In anthrooologie, the system was strongly unbalanced with built-in status differences between wife-givers and wife-takers.

In South America he showed that there are “dual organizations” throughout Amazon rainforest cultures, and that these “dual organizations” represent opposites and their synthesis. According to Leach, in Kachin reality instabilities arose primarily from competition for bridewealth. This type of anthropology, developed by late nineteenth-century and early twentieth-century scholars, was eventually called “de Leidse Richting,” or “de Leidse School,”. His model explained practices that were not observed.

Hegel explains that every situation presents two opposing things and their resolution; Fichte had termed these ” thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. Marxists shifted the attention within anthropology from an almost exclusive preoccupation with kinship to an emphasis on economic issues. By using this site, strajss agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Structural anthropology – Wikipedia

This article needs additional citations for verification. Much earlier, and some miles north of Paris, a specific type of applied anthropology emerged at Leiden UniversityNetherlands that focused frequently on the relationship between apparent cultural phenomena found in the Indonesian archipelago: Structuralism Anthropology Anthropology books.

The most recent chairs structutale held by J. Learn how and when to remove these template messages. This page was last edited on 14 Decemberat Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources.

These status inequalities can destabilise the entire system or can at least lead to an accumulation of wives and in the case of the Kachin, also of bridewealth at one end of the chain. He found that the latter’s analysis of the Kachin contained serious flaws.


Gifts are not merely physical, incidental objects; they possess cultural and spiritual properties. This involves an asymmetric exchange between at least three groups. Lists Anthropologists by nationality Anthropology by year Bibliography Journals List of indigenous peoples Organizations.

Views Read Edit View history. Social relationships are therefore based on exchange; Durkheimian solidarity, according to Mauss, is best achieved through structures of reciprocity and related systems of exchange. The “Leiden” perspective drove research for many decades, influencing successive generations of anthropologists. Boyer pointed out that ztructurale research on concepts in psychology have not supported a structuralistic view of concepts, but rather a theory-oriented or prototype-based view.

This article possibly contains original research. Archaeological Biological Cultural Linguistic Social. Consequently, the last wife-taking strucurale in the chain is significantly inferior to the first wife-giving group to which it is supposed to give its wives.

For him, opposites formed the basis of social structure and culture.

Matrilateral cross-cousin marriage arrangements where the marriage of the parents is repeated by successive generations are very common in parts of Asia e. Culture, he claimed, has to take into account both life and death and needs to have a way of mediating between the two. Possibly the most significant influence on structuralism came from Mauss’ The Gift.

This theory attracted students and researchers interested in a holistic approach, that was broad and deep, that related economic circumstances with mythological and spatial classifications and that explored the relationship between the natural world and religious, symbolic systems.

Gift exchanges, therefore play a crucial role in creating and maintaining social relationships by structruale bonds of obligations. It is a “total prestation” as Mauss called it, as it carries the power to create a system of reciprocity in which the honour of both giver and recipient are engaged.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Just as speakers strakss talk without awareness of grammar, he argued, humans are unaware of the workings of social structures in daily life. Men sought to get the maximum profit in forms of either bridewealth or political advantage from their daughters’ marriage.


These tribal societies are made up of multiple moieties that often split up, rendering them comparatively unstable. Internal incoherence and a range of intrinsic limitations further reduced its appeal. Another concept was borrowed from the Prague school of linguisticswhich employed so-called binary oppositions in their research. Continued restricted exchange means that the two lineages marry together.

Moreover, it is not just atructurale nuclear family as such, but alliances between families that matter in regard to the creation of social structures, reflecting the typical structuralist argument that the position of an element in the structure is more significant than the element itself.

Anthropologie structurale deux

Through the gift, the givers give part of themselves, imbuing the gift a certain power that compels a response. By overstressing the structural anthopologie of affinal ties, alliance theory effectively neglected the importance of descent and genealogical ties. Accordingly, he grouped all possible kinship systems into a scheme containing three basic kinship structures constructed out of two types of exchange.

Leach was more concerned with researching people’s actual lives than with the discovery of universal mental structures. Exogamy promotes inter-group alliances and forms structures of social networks. He showed too that the ways people initially categorized animals, treesand other natural features, were based on a series of oppositions.

Social structures mirror cognitive structures, meaning that patterns in social interaction can be treated as their manifestations. Kuper allowed that exchange was the universal form of marriage, but there could be other significant factors.

With the advent of postmoderninterpretive- hermeneutic thought, structuralist and functionalist theories went receded.